A Stance of Non-Violence
Jun 7th, 2010 by Nola
When non-violence in speech, thought and action is established, one’s aggressive nature is relinquished and others abandon hostility in one’s presence.
~Yoga Sūtra II.35 of Patañjali.
On the evening of September 11, 2001, I had a yoga class scheduled. Knowing yoga always cleared my mind, I decided not to skip it. It was a small class that night; most stayed home to watch coverage, I suppose. We quietly got our mats laid out and ourselves seated to begin class. We were all shocked and sad.
The yoga instructor, Becky, was as equally dumbfounded as we were. We sat together, her facing us. She read to us the “yama” (ethical discipline) of “ahiṃsā” (non-violence); she read to us the above-cited yoga sūtra. She explained that on such a day as that Tuesday was, it was hard to adhere to an idea of non-violence. But that revenge in the way of a counter-attack or, well, VIOLENCE was to be abhorred.
That night, I disagreed with Becky. Not verbally, but in my thoughts. To me, America HAD to show force; to exact revenge; to show strength. And Bush then gave us a tough talking to that made me glad he was President instead of Gore.
But then the Bush Administration got things muddled with lies of WMD. And we went to war in Iraq based on those lies. And we, America, are still paying a very high price. And for what? Revenge. As bizarre as it all is, Bush used our desire to capture Bin Laden to instead go after Hussein. But we, America, were so lustful for blood, we greedily signed on to war in the Middle East in hopes it would sate our appetite.
I admit now that I was wrong on the night of 9/11. That theory of non-violence was right. Sure, we must respond to attacks. But we need not resort to violence. It is NOT all there is in the way of dealing with evil in this world.
* * *
Over the last few weeks, I have been hungry again for blood the way I was post-9/11. I wanted the blood of a BP executive and nothing short of a miserable existence/death would have sufficed. But over the last few days, Becky’s words, the yama of ahiṃsā, the ethical discipline of non-violence has been creeping into my thoughts.
The shame of violence, of harming others, is simply that it is an offence against underlying unity and therefore a crime against truth.
~B.K.S. Iyengar, “Light on Life.”
My anger over BP isn’t gone. My desire to hold them accountable still exists. But my desire to have one BP exec stuffed in the well for every pelican, fish, or plankton whose death was caused by the spill has subsided.
Nothing comes from violence and nothing ever could.”
~Sting, “Fragile.”
My vigilance regarding BP won’t be diminished. But the taste for blood is gone. I realize harm coming to a BP exec won’t give me the Gulf back; it won’t satisfy my desire for things to get set straight. I see now that continuing to focus my energy on negativity and being “violent in thought”—knowing that it is true that nothing positive ever does come from violence—will only beget more violence. I just can’t take anymore violence.
Namaste, y’all.
